Ward 1 (South) Thornhill Residents Inc.

Home About News Membership Contact Us Useful Links Pomona Mills Current Issues Gallery Flood Survey Bayview/John Developments

Events Affecting Ward 1 Residents

Below are events of interest to Thornhill Ward One Residents. If you know of another event Click Here to tell us about it.

Video of Thornhill All Candidates Meetng October 5th, 2026 ....

Please, visit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlD4i6dsaKI

To watch the Thornhill All Candidates Meeting held on October 5th, 2026 at the Thornhill Community Center.

---

Questions and Answers Regional Candidate Joe Li ......

Thornhill Survey

Questions for Joe Li — Regional Councillor

Thornhill Candidates Meeting — Survey Responses • Joe Li, for Regional Councillor, City of Markham
Question 1. The City of Markham owns a number of heritage homes that are sitting vacant. Will you
support the necessary funding to protect the homes and to provide funding on any properties that are
deteriorating to bring them to a stable condition and ensure protection?
Answer: Yes — inventory, stabilize and protect City-owned heritage homes with dedicated funding.
The City must lead by example.

Question 2. How many data centres do we have in the York Region? Would you do a moratorium for a
year so that there is public consultation and no decisions made in camera? Who is paying for the infrastructure to provide the energy, water, and avoid noise pollution, air pollution?
Answer: I support a one-year pause for public consultation, decisions in open session, and proponents paying the full cost of energy and water infrastructure.

Question 3. Residents and businesses in the Yonge and Steeles area are increasingly witnessing people
experiencing homelessness and living on the streets, including people sleeping on sidewalks and in front of businesses. We recognize that these are people who are struggling and often facing serious challenges involving mental health, addiction, poverty or a lack of stable housing. Our concern is not simply where these people are sleeping, but whether they are receiving the help, dignity and support they need to have a genuine opportunity to get off the streets. At the same time, residents, families,
employees and business owners are routinely dealing with visible drug use, discarded needles and drug paraphernalia, recurring mental-health and behavioural crises, garbage and human waste. We believe compassion must extend to everyone involved. These concerns are not going unreported, yet
the same problems continue to occur. There is also growing concern that the location of this area — on the boundary between municipalities and across different levels of government and service jurisdictions — is allowing responsibility to become fragmented. What would you do, within the authority of the position you are seeking, to create a coordinated and accountable response that
connects people experiencing homelessness with the support they need, while also addressing the legitimate safety and sanitation concerns of the surrounding community?
Answer: One coordination table — York Region, Markham, Vaughan, Toronto and both police services — linking people to housing and help while keeping sidewalks safe and clean.

Question 4. What can you do to reduce the number of break-ins and robberies happening all over the York Region?
Answer: Fully fund York Regional Police, target high-incident areas, press for bail reform, and report
results publicly.

Question 5. The City purchased the Shouldice lands in 2022 for approximately $188 million. It was
supposed to be protected in perpetuity as parkland. Why hasn’t the City officially named this park and erected park signage yet? Is this City just land banking? What will you do to ensure residents that the land is actually protected in perpetuity?
Answer: Name it, sign it, and zone it as a park — protection in perpetuity must be law, not only intention.

Question 6. Walking east from the Pomona tennis court parking lot, it is necessary currently to walk through a hole in a chain link fence to access the path that connects to Shouldice. Given that the path and the Shouldice grounds are now Markham property, what is the status and timeline to properly connect Pomona Park to Shouldice Park?
Answer: A safe, proper entrance now, a public staff report, and a funded timeline to complete the connection.

Question 7. Why is the Shouldice Park not officially designated as a park? What are you going to do to ensure this happens? Can you buy the strip of land that goes from Glynnwood property to Pomona Park to do the connection?
Answer: Complete the park designation without further delay, and secure the Glynnwood strip by purchase or easement.

Question 8. On numerous occasions, the Ford Government has heavy handedly overridden carefullyplanned and publicly vetted municipal land development plans with Ministry Zoning orders. If elected,what will you do to prevent this?
Answer: Every Markham position on an MZO should be a recorded vote in open session; I will seek municipal consent and public consultation for such orders.

Question 9. Do you take campaign donations from developers? If so, how can Markham residents truly know you are not beholden to the developers when making land development decisions?
Answer: All contributions to my campaign are publicly disclosed, no contribution influences my vote,and any interest is declared.

Question 10. There is a growing perception among residents that community feedback is treated as a
formality, while developers' interests carry more weight in municipal decision-making. What specific actions would you take to restore public confidence and ensure residents have a genuine voice in development decisions affecting their neighbourhoods?
Answer: Early consultation, published results, open recorded votes, and consistent application of the Official Plan.

Question 11. The Ontario Land Tribunal recently ruled in favour of the developer, Primont Homes, for their application regarding 2300 John Street. This happened over the objections of local residents, who continue to oppose this development. Please explain what, in your view, needs to be done differently in future so that the concerns of local residents are taken into account.
Answer: Earlier consultation, independent technical reviews, and clear written reasons, so residents know their concerns were fully considered.

Question 12. There have been a few development approvals recently, where reduced parking ratios for proposed condo buildings have been accepted by the city on the grounds that some residents will not own cars and will use transit options. Examples include 2300 John Street (Primont Homes) and 8432 and 8500 Leslie Street at Highway 7 (Shatsford Development). Please explain what examples exist elsewhere in the city that demonstrate that Markham residents are moving to less car ownership in favour of transit use. In your view, is choosing to discourage car ownership realistic and viable for Markham?
Answer: Only beside existing, funded rapid transit — evidence-based, with visitor parking and neighbouring streets protected.

Question 13. Would you be willing to organize with other municipal councils to publicly oppose Ministerial Zoning Orders that do not align with municipal long term plans?
Answer: Yes — I will work with York Region's municipalities toward a shared position favouring local
consent and consultation.

Question 14. Markham’s population has increased. As a result, wildlife is being forced out of their
homes by development creating the potential for more human/wildlife conflicts. Despite this, Markham is only served by two Animal Care Officers and residents are told Markham is short staffed and unable to help them with many wildlife situations. If elected, what will you do to help improve the Animal Care service to Markham residents?
Answer: More Animal Care Officers, based on a public report on demand, response times and unmet need.

Question 15. Global bird populations are decreasing at an alarming rate. One of the main reasons is because of birds colliding with glass windows. Markham has prided itself for being a leader in the protection of birds through bird safe legislation; however, there are numerous municipal buildings
which need to be retrofitted with bird-safe film. If elected, what will you do to help get existing Markham municipal buildings safe for birds?
Answer: Audit all municipal buildings and retrofit the highest-risk ones first, with lights out during migration.

Question 16. Light and Noise Pollution is very harmful to nature and humans. It also blocks our ability to view the stars, planets and wonders of the universe. Brighter lights and upwards facing lighting is increasing despite recommendations to have night-sky compliant lighting. If elected, what will you do to mitigate light and noise pollution?
Answer: Dark-sky lighting for City facilities and new development, and clear noise limits, fairly enforced.

Question 17. What is your expectation for the future quality of life for residents of Markham Ward
One, as a result of the provincial MZO relating to the Yonge North Subway extension? Do the current
issues with the Vaughan Metropolitan Centre development perhaps provide a warning to the
developers and politicians in Markham Ward One?

Answer: Growth must be phased with transit, schools, parks and jobs — the Vaughan Metropolitan
Centre shows the cost of failing to do so.

Question 18. What is the plan for low income seniors, whose monthly income mostly goes for property
taxes and car and home insurance?
Answer: Expand and promote tax deferral and seniors' assistance programs, alongside disciplined budgets, so seniors can stay in their homes.

Question 19. What would you do to tighten rules around vacant homes, and short & long term rentals
to ensure that property standards are met?
Answer: Enforce short-term rental rules, register and inspect vacant buildings, and apply property standards fairly to every property.

Question 20. With respect to e-bikes and micro-mobility vehicles, what regulations need to change in future to ensure the safety of pedestrians, cyclists and drivers? What changes are needed to ensure safe storage of these vehicles from a fire safety perspective, making sure any new rules are practical and within municipal authority?
Answer: Clear rules for sidewalks and trails, and safe battery charging and storage, developed with Markham Fire.

Question 21. What do you think is the most important problem facing Markham today?
Answer: Growth must be matched by the transit, parks, schools and services it requires.

Question 22. What are your objectives about the environment and what can you do to protect it?
Answer: Protect the Greenway and Rouge lands, grow the tree canopy, and enforce environmental conditions after construction.

Question 23. What about bringing more jobs to York Region, especially in Markham?
Answer: Protect employment lands, fund rapid transit, and approve employment projects promptly.

Question 24. What does success look like at the end of your next four years as councillor?
Answer: Shouldice named and protected, the Pomona connection underway, a data-centre policy in place, and rapid transit funding progressing.

Question 25. Given the provincial over reach and their constraints on municipal planning, what can you do specifically and Council do collectively to represent the interests of Markham residents?
Answer: Open positions, responsible use of the authority we retain, collective action with other municipalities, and honest reporting to residents.

Question 26. In York Region, Jews are about 5% of the population, with 15–18 synagogues and 5–7 Jewish schools. York Region has witnessed a troubling increase in antisemitic incidents; Jewish residents represented 79% of victims in religion-based hate crimes. What would you do to tackle the issue of antisemitism in the City or Region?
Answer: Zero tolerance — fund the Hate Crime Unit, make reporting easy, and support security for
synagogues and schools.

Question 27. Why is there limited planning cooperation between Markham, Vaughan and York Region to protect the heritage nature of Ward One?
Answer: A joint Markham–Vaughan–York Region heritage protocol, with shared standards for one historic community.

Question 28. Can you tell us how you would propose the Region handle the funding gap of $2 billion in
bus rapid transit and community housing?
Answer: One clear, evidence-based funding request to Ottawa and Queen's Park — with the Region contributing its fair share.

Question 29. Paul Chiang, sitting just a few feet away from Joe Tay, we are wondering if there is anything you would like to say?
Answer: Every candidate must run free of foreign interference or intimidation. The decision belongs
to Markham's voters.

Question 30. How, given the Province's powers/interests in place which override local community
interests, do you intend to take planning back / local planning decisions back into the hands of the municipality? We want our interests and ideas to be as influential as developers, and need reps to represent us more emphatically!
Answer: Residents deserve the same access, information and standing as any applicant — in local decisions and in provincial advocacy.
Thank you!

JOE LI
For Markham Regional Councillor
Campaign Office
108 - 18 Crown Steel Dr, Markham ON L3R 9X8
Cell: 416-505-7258 Phone#: 647-479-8738
Email: Joeli@Joeli.ca

---

Questions and Answers School Trustee Cindy Hackelberg 2026 .....

QUESTION 1: A recent major Governmental study titled Antisemitism in Ontario’s K-12 Schools analyzed 781 documented antisemtic incidents across the province, and identified the YRDSB as one of three primary “hotspots” in Ontario. The YRDSB accounted for 15.7% of all reported hate incidents across Ontario. YRDSB has about 10 to 14,000 Jewish students out of a total student population of about 127,000.
Then there are the recent human rights complaints against four Ontario school boards, including the York Region District School Board, and two teachers’ unions. The teachers complained not only that they suffered discrimination for their “creed, ethnic origin, and ancerstry,” but also that the schools and unions penalized them for reporting alleged instances of antisemitism.
Where do you stand on the issue of antisemitism in our public school system?

ANSWER FROM CINDY HACKELBERG: Antisemitism has no place in our schools or our society. Every Jewish student, educator, and family has the right to feel safe, respected, and included in their school community.
If elected, I would support clear and accessible reporting procedures, timely and impartial investigations, and safeguards against retaliation for students, staff, and families who raise concerns in good faith.
Education is also essential. Students and staff need the knowledge and support to recognize antisemitism, understand Jewish history and the Holocaust, and respond appropriately to discrimination and hate.
As a trustee and member of the community, I would take these concerns seriously, seek accountability,
and work with fellow trustees to assess the effectiveness of board policies and advocate for improvements where needed. Every report of antisemitism must be taken seriously, investigated fairly, and addressed appropriately.

QUESTION 2: How would you deal with the concerns of unwanted sexual conduct as it relates to teaching/educating students?

ANSWER FOM CINDY HACKELBERG: I'm not sure whether this question refers to sex education and how these topics are taught in the classroom, or to concerns about sexual misconduct in our schools. I believe both are important and
deserve thoughtful consideration.
As a trustee, I would support age-appropriate, curriculum-based education that teaches students about consent, personal boundaries, respectful relationships, and how to seek help. These topics should be taught thoughtfully, with sensitivity to students’ developmental needs and well-being.
Regarding sexual misconduct, concerns must be taken seriously and handled promptly and appropriately. I would support clear professional standards, effective reporting procedures, and fair processes for addressing concerns.
If elected, I would listen carefully to parents and constituents and bring their concerns to the board for
discussion and consideration. I believe parents should feel heard, educators should have clear guidance,
and students’ safety and dignity must remain central to every decision.

---

Christina Cadorin Candidate Ward 1 Questions and Answers .....

1 Planning growth and local influence
Q8 How would you respond when a Minister’s Zoning Order
overrides a locally developed plan?
I would seek a public explanation of what the order changes, why it is proposed and what its infrastructure and neighbourhood consequences would be. I would bring residents’ evidence to Council and seek a clear municipal position, direct discussions with the Province and amendments where warranted. I cannot promise a municipal veto over provincial authority. I can commit to using the
influence and planning tools available, and explaining the outcome to residents.

Q10 How would you ensure residents influence development
decisions?
I would seek consultation early enough to affect a proposal, with understandable drawings, alternatives and impact information. I would advocate for a public response record showing what residents raised, what changed and why some requests were not accepted. I would support accessible meetings with direct questions and written follow-up. Consultation should inform the decision while Council also
considers housing needs, evidence and its legal responsibilities.

Q11 What should change following the Tribunal proceedings
concerning Primont at 2300 John Street?

I would begin by reviewing the actual Tribunal reasons, the City’s position and any outstanding conditions. Residents deserve an accurate explanation of where their concerns were considered and why the outcome differed from their wishes. For future applications, I would seek earlier engagement,
timely decisions supported by defensible planning evidence, and careful preparation for appeals. For this site, I would identify the implementation issues still open to influence rather than promise to reopen a settled approval.

Q12 What evidence supports lower parking ratios at John Street and Leslie Street, and is less car ownership realistic?
I would ask staff to publish comparable local evidence on vehicle ownership, parking use, visitor demand
and transit availability. I cannot presently point to a verified Markham example that proves these particular ratios will work. A transit-rich location may support fewer parking spaces, but assumptions must reflect service available when residents move in, accessibility needs and spillover risks. I would seek site-specific justification and a monitoring plan, including remedies within municipal authority if the
assumptions prove wrong.

Q13 Would you work with other municipalities to oppose
inappropriate Minister’s Zoning Orders?
Yes. Where an order conflicts with sound local planning, I would support a joint, evidence-based
position with neighbouring municipalities. That should identify the changes sought and their benefits,
including infrastructure commitments, heritage protection and meaningful consultation. A shared request can strengthen our voice. I would judge each order on its actual provisions and effects, and explain publicly why I supported opposition, negotiation or an alternative approach.
Q17 What would you do about the quality-of-life impacts of
growth around the Yonge North Subway Extension?
The subway should support a liveable community. I would seek a cumulative assessment of planned housing alongside schools, parks, servicing, traffic and the timing of transit delivery. I would ask for named responsibilities and funded milestones, with appropriate sequencing tools where legally
available. We should examine evidence from Vaughan Metropolitan Centre for useful lessons, without assuming its circumstances prove the same outcome here. Residents need to see how public space and services will keep pace, but also feel comfortable and knowledgeable about what is taking place.

Q25 What can you do individually and Council do collectively
when provincial powers constrain local planning?
Individually, I can study proposals, raise residents’ concerns, request information, bring forward motions
through the proper process and explain my votes. Collectively, Council can establish municipal positions,
direct staff within its authority, allocate resources and advocate to the Province. I would work with colleagues to build support for practical amendments. I would clearly distinguish what Markham can decide, what another authority controls and what we are asking that authority to change. I will be a voice on Markham Council who works and listens to the people.

Q30 How would you strengthen local planning influence and give residents a voice comparable to developers?

I would pursue two tracks: stronger local participation now, and advocacy for changes to provincial rules
where local accountability has been weakened. Residents need early notice, accessible technical explanations and a clear record of how their evidence affected the decision. I would support shared planning positions with neighbouring councils and residents’ associations. Restoring powers requires
provincial action; meanwhile, I would use municipal policy, design, infrastructure and conservation tools carefully and transparently.2 Heritage parks and neighbourhood connections

Q1 Will you support funding to secure and stabilize vacant City-owned heritage homes?

Yes. I would support a condition-based programme for securing and stabilizing City-owned heritage
buildings, with costed priorities and regular reporting. Immediate weatherproofing and security should
be considered alongside longer-term repair and appropriate reuse. I would ask which properties are at
greatest risk, what work is funded and who is accountable for delivery. Responsible stewardship includes examining partnerships and viable occupancy so that public heritage assets have a sustainable future.

Q5 Why is the Shouldice property not clearly named and signed, and how would you secure its parkland future?

The City’s 2022 announcement identified public park and open-space use for the Shouldice purchase. I would request a current report separating land-use protection, hospital lease arrangements, public access, naming and signage. I would seek a published delivery schedule and an explanation of the strongest available long-term protections. I would not assume that a delay proves land banking, or claim
that a park sign alone guarantees protection in perpetuity.

Q6 When will a proper connection between Pomona Mills Park
and the Shouldice lands replace the informal fence access?

I would ask staff to inspect the reported access point and confirm ownership, permissions,environmental constraints and the intended trail alignment. Residents should receive a clear answer about whether an interim safe connection is feasible and what a permanent accessible route would cost. I would seek a responsible project lead and a published timetable. I would not encourage use of an informal opening until staff confirm that the route is safe and authorized.

Q7 Will you seek formal park protection and acquire the
Glynnwood connection if needed?
I would first establish the property’s current planning designation and protections; an informal park
name does not establish its legal status. I would support a public report on any further protection required and the options for a continuous trail. Those options could include an easement, an agreement or acquisition if necessary and affordable. I would seek negotiation with affected owners and an environmental and accessibility review before promising a purchase or route.

Q27 How would you improve heritage planning cooperation
between Markham, Vaughan and York Region?
I would ask the three municipalities to identify existing coordination arrangements and the gaps residents experience. Thornhill’s character crosses municipal boundaries, so I would advocate for shared heritage mapping, early consultation on projects with cross-boundary effects and coordinated public-realm and infrastructure planning. Each authority retains its own responsibilities. A practical first step would be a joint work programme naming the issues, responsible staff and reporting dates, with
heritage specialists and residents contributing.

3 Environment infrastructure and public space

Q2 How many data centres are in York Region, would you
support a one-year pause, and who pays for their impacts?

I do not have a verified regional count and would request an inventory distinguishing operating,approved and proposed facilities. I would seek public information on electricity and water demand, noise, emissions, community benefits and how upgrade costs are allocated. I would support staff
assessing a time-limited pause where lawful and justified by evidence gaps, rather than promise a blanket one-year moratorium. Discussion should be public except where a specific lawful closed-session exception applies, with the reason explained. I also believe that research needs to be provided as to the benefits and detriments of having a data center in the community, this needs to be established and
made public.

Q14 How would you improve Animal Care services as
development affects wildlife?
I would request current staffing, service hours, call volumes, response times and the division of
responsibility between Animal Care, wildlife rehabilitators and other agencies. I would not rely on an
unverified officer count. If the evidence shows unmet needs, I would support costed options for staffing,training or service partnerships. Habitat protection, prevention advice and humane responses should be part of the approach, with clear guidance about which service residents should contact.

Q15 Will you support bird-safe retrofits on existing municipal buildings?
Yes. I would seek an audit identifying municipal buildings with the greatest collision risk, then support a
prioritized, costed retrofit programme. Treatments should be suitable for each building and their effectiveness monitored. Markham’s bird-friendly guidelines provide a starting point, but residents should be able to see which buildings have been assessed, treated and scheduled for work. I would also encourage practical guidance for owners of existing private buildings.

Q16 How would you reduce harmful light and noise pollution?
I would ask staff to identify recurring sources and assess enforcement, design standards and municipal operating practices. I would support shielded lighting, appropriate brightness and controls that reduce unnecessary nighttime illumination while maintaining safety and accessibility. For noise, I would seek clear complaint handling, evidence-based investigation and enforceable mitigation. Municipal facilities should demonstrate good practice, and measures should be evaluated for their effects on residents,
wildlife and essential services.

Q20 What changes would you seek for micromobility safety and battery storage?
I would seek a clear account of the rules for each device type, where it can operate and who enforces those rules. I would support a safety review covering pedestrian conflicts, speed, parking, connected routes and accessibility. For battery storage and charging, I would ask Fire and Emergency Services to lead guidance and assess policy options for apartments and public facilities. Any new local requirements
must fit provincial law and applicable codes; e-bikes and e-scooters should not be treated as interchangeable. [S6]

Q22 What are your environmental objectives and how would you
deliver them?
I would focus on protecting natural areas and tree canopy, reducing avoidable emissions and preparing neighbourhoods for flooding and extreme heat. I would ask that capital and planning decisions identify environmental effects and the maintenance resources needed over time. My proposed measures of progress include canopy retention and survival, habitat connections, municipal energy use and delivery of flood-risk projects. I would seek a verified baseline before proposing numerical targets and publish progress against funded actions.

4 Community safety homelessness and inclusion

Q3 How would you coordinate homelessness support with safety and sanitation at Yonge and Steeles??I would ask City staff to work with York Region, neighbouring municipalities, outreach and health
services, businesses and police on a joint response with a named coordinating lead. People need routes into housing and care; residents and businesses also need clean, safe and accessible public space. I would seek a shared escalation process, reliable sanitation and sharps removal, and reporting on service connections and repeat problems without exposing personal information. Success should mean
sustained help and safer conditions, rather than displacement across a boundary. I would also like to be
quick to respond to these individuals and provide them with resources that are available such as Blue Door shelters, and education and provisions to help them get back on their feet.

Q4 How would you help reduce break-ins and robberies?
I would seek location-specific crime trends and residents’ experiences, then work with York Regional Police and community partners on prevention and reporting. City measures can include safer public-space design, lighting and addressing property neglect. I would advocate through the appropriate
channels for police resources supported by evidence, while respecting operational independence. I
would request regular community updates on trends and prevention results, and avoid claiming that a
ward councillor can direct investigations or guarantee an end to crime.

Q26 What would you do to tackle antisemitism in Markham and
York Region?
Antisemitism must be confronted clearly. Jewish residents should be able to worship, attend school and participate in public life without threats or harassment. I would meet community representatives and police, support accessible reporting and victim assistance, and seek prompt action on hate graffiti on City property. I would advocate for risk-based protection through the appropriate authorities and
education that addresses antisemitism directly. I would use verified statistics with dates and definitions, and support consistent protection against hate for every community. Safety and inclusion must be at the forefront of Council, there is no room for hate crimes in Markham, and that must be enforced.

5 Affordability housing standards and local jobs

Q18 What would you do for low-income seniors struggling with taxes and insurance costs?
I would help residents find existing tax-assistance and deferral programmes and ask whether eligibility,
awareness or application barriers leave people without support. Deferral postpones payment; it does
not erase the obligation, and that must be explained clearly. I would examine affordable service and
housing options with the Region and community partners. Insurance pricing is outside a ward
councillor’s control, but I would raise residents’ concerns with the responsible provincial representatives
and regulators. [S9]

Q19 How would you improve standards for vacant homes and
short- and long-term rentals?
I would seek a review of recurring complaints, inspection capacity, enforcement outcomes and any gaps
in the rules. Homes should meet applicable property, fire and safety standards regardless of tenure. I
would support proportionate options such as better owner contact information, timely inspections and
clear escalation for persistent noncompliance. Any new registration, licensing or vacancy measure
should be assessed for legal authority, cost, tenant protection and effects on housing supply. Rent and
eviction disputes require the appropriate provincial process.

Q23 How would you help attract more jobs to Markham and York
Region?
I would work with economic-development staff, employers, educational institutions and small businesses to understand what supports durable local employment. Priorities would include retaining existing businesses, helping firms navigate municipal processes, and connecting skills development with real hiring needs. I would assess proposed incentives against public cost and measurable benefits. For
major facilities, I would distinguish construction jobs from permanent employment and weigh infrastructure demand alongside economic value.
Q28 How would you address the reported regional funding gap
for rapid transit and community housing?
York Region has identified major transit and housing investments dependent on senior-government funding. I would ask for an updated project-by-project account of the gap, costs and timing before treating a headline figure as fixed. As a ward councillor, I would advocate through Markham Council and its regional representatives for coordinated federal and provincial funding, phased delivery and
transparent trade-offs. Borrowing and partnerships need affordability and risk assessment. I would not promise that the Region can close the gap without consequences for other priorities. [S10]

6 Integrity priorities and accountability

Q9 Do you accept developer-related campaign donations, and
how would you protect your independence?
Residents deserve a direct answer based on my campaign records. I will explain my donation policy and
the contributions received, including how I treat eligible individual donors with development interests.
No contribution should purchase access or favourable treatment. I would explain my planning votes,
comply with disclosure and conflict-of-interest requirements and seek advice where needed. Corporate
developer donations and lawful donations by individuals are different questions, and I will be explicit
about both. [S2]

Q21 What do you consider Markham’s most important problem?
My priority is ensuring that growth improves everyday life and that residents can see how decisions
serve them. Housing, transportation, infrastructure, public services and community character affect one
another. I would focus on the gaps between what is approved, what is funded and what residents
actually receive. Stronger communication is part of that work: people need clear explanations, genuine
opportunities to contribute and follow-up they can rely on.

Q24 What would success look like at the end of four years?
Success would include residents receiving dependable responses, a clearer public account of
development and infrastructure, and measurable progress on agreed local priorities. I propose a first-
year work plan, regular progress reports and an annual public review of commitments, results and
setbacks. I would track what I personally undertook separately from outcomes requiring Council or
other agencies. Residents should be able to see where I made a contribution and where work remains.

Q29 How would you respond to the question directed personally to Paul Chiang about Joe Tay?
That question is addressed to Paul Chiang, and he should answer it himself. I would not speak for either
candidate or speculate about their exchange. My own standard is that political disagreement must never become threats or intimidation. Residents deserve respectful conduct, accountability for our own words and a forum where candidates can answer legitimate questions directly.

---

Joe Tay Questions and Answers 2026 ....

Joe Tay

Question 1

Question: The City of Markham owns a number of heritage homes that are sitting vacant. Will you support the necessary funding to protect the homes and to provide funding on any properties that are deteriorating to bring them to a stable condition and ensure protection?

Answer: Yes. These are Markham’s assets, stories to be told to our next generations of how Markham evolves and collective memories of many plus it can create local economy. I would support the funding needed to stabilize and protect Markham-owned heritage homes. I would first ask for a public condition assessment and prioritized maintenance plan, then report progress openly. Careful maintenance protects these public assets and prevents residents from facing a larger bill after avoidable deterioration.

Question 2

Question: How many data centres do we have in the York Region? Would you do a moratorium for a year so that there is public consultation and no decisions made in camera. Who is paying for the infastructure to provide the energy, water, and avoid noise pollution, air pollution?

Answer: I do not have a verified count of York Region data centres and will not guess. I support a one-year pause on new approvals so a new Council can understand the full picture: inventory existing facilities, hear residents, and review electricity, water, noise and air-quality impacts. Before decisions resume, Council should make clear what infrastructure is needed, who pays, and how impacts will be managed ‘ON CAMERA’.

Question 3

Question: Residents and businesses in the Yonge and Steeles area are increasingly witnessing people experiencing homelessness and living on the streets, including people sleeping on sidewalks and in front of businesses. We recognize that these are people who are struggling and often facing serious challenges involving mental health, addiction, poverty or a lack of stable housing.

Our concern is not simply where these people are sleeping, but whether they are receiving the help, dignity and support they need to have a genuine opportunity to get off the streets. Simply moving people from one location to another or repeatedly responding to the same crises is not a meaningful long-term solution.

At the same time, residents, families, employees and business owners are routinely dealing with visible drug use, discarded needles and drug paraphernalia, recurring mental-health and behavioural crises, garbage and human waste. Those who live, work and pay taxes in the area should not be expected to simply accept these conditions as unavoidable.

We believe compassion must extend to everyone involved. Vulnerable people deserve meaningful help, while residents and businesses deserve safe, clean and accessible public spaces.

These concerns are not going unreported. We contact bylaw, police and emergency services when necessary, yet the same problems continue to occur.

There is also growing concern that the location of this area—on the boundary between municipalities and across different levels of government and service jurisdictions—is allowing responsibility to become fragmented. When Markham, Vaughan, Toronto, York Regional Police, emergency services, York Region community and health services and bylaw enforcement are all involved, it can appear that responsibility falls between the cracks.

What would you do, within the authority of the position you are seeking, to create a coordinated and accountable response that connects people experiencing homelessness with the support they need, while also addressing the legitimate safety and sanitation concerns of the surrounding community?

Answer: This is a massive undertaking because the boundary between municipalities and across different levels of government and service jurisdictions, I would bring Markham, Vaughan, Toronto, York Region community and health services, police, emergency responders and outreach providers together around a named lead and shared follow-up. People need connections to housing, mental-health and addiction supports; residents and businesses need safe, clean public spaces but more importantly we must not not satisfy by just a quick temporary fix rather than working towards treatment with a recovery timetable. I would also press the Province to overhaul their outdated funding formula for municipalities, a $450 million annually owed to York Region so local taxpayers are not left carrying gaps created by outdated formulas.

Source: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/york-region-community-services-shortfall-report-ontario-9.7359796

Question 4

Question: What can you do to reduce the number of break-ins and robberies happening all over the York Region?

Answer: Community safety is a top concern. York Region has about 140 police officers per 100,000 residents, compared with an Ontario average of 175–185. I would press for funding to close that gap, more neighbourhood patrols and stronger police-community communication, so officers understand local concerns and residents can help prevent break-ins and robberies.

Question 5

Question: The City purchased the Shouldice lands in 2022 for approximately $188 million. It was supposed to be protected in perpetuity as parkland. Why hasn’t the City officially named this park and erected park signage yet? Is this City just land banking? What will you do to ensure residents that the land is actually protected in perpetuity?

Answer: Residents deserve certainty that the Shouldice lands will remain parkland. I would ask Council to complete the formal park designation, publish the legal protection, park plan and schedule, and install clear signage. I would report progress publicly so residents can see what has been done, what remains, and who is responsible.

Question 6

Question: Walking east from the Pomona tennis court parking lot, it is necessary currently to walk through a hole in a chain link fence to access the path that connects to Shouldice. Given that the path and the Shouldice grounds are now Markham property, what is the status and timeline to properly connect Pomona Park to Shouldice Park?

Answer: I would ask staff to provide a public status report and timeline for a safe, accessible Pomona-to-Shouldice connection, including approvals, design, costs and any interim safety steps. Growth and transportation planning must move together. I would work with Council and residents to identify funding and complete the connection as soon as practicable. And what I’d like to do in parallel as well is to involve residents in land use expertise for inputs; simply they would provide their firsthand experience as residents in the early stage of this project. Resident first approach.

Question 7

Question: Why is the Shouldice Park not officially designated as a park? What are you going to do to ensure this happens? Can you buy the strip of land that goes from Glynnwood property to Pomona Park to do the connection?

Answer: As In September 2022, the City of Markham purchased the property for $188 million to save the green space and historic McCullagh Estate. If elected, I will revisit the purchase conditions in detail to understand the transaction other than real estate in nature but also historic before I would press for formal park designation and lasting protection, with a public timeline and clear signage. For the strip between Glynnwood and Pomona, I would ask staff to assess ownership, cost, environmental impact and purchase or easement options. I would bring a feasible proposal to Council rather than promise a land purchase before those facts are known.

Question 8

Question: On numerous occasions, the Ford Government has heavy handedly overridden carefully planned and publicly vetted municipal land development plans with Ministry Zoning orders. If elected, what will you do to prevent this?

Answer: A councillor cannot unilaterally stop a provincial MZO. I would publicly press the Province to respect municipal plans and meaningful consultation, document effects on roads, transit and community services, and work with other councils to oppose MZOs that conflict with long-term plans. I would also seek advice on lawful options and keep residents informed.

Question 9

Question: Do you take campaign donations from developers? If so, how can Markham residents truly know you are not beholden to the developers when making land development decisions?

Answer: No. I do not accept campaign donations from developers nor would I accept any in the future elections. My campaign-finance filings will show my contributions. I will make planning decisions on the merits, explain my reasoning publicly, and follow all disclosure and conflict-of-interest rules.

Question 10

Question: There is a growing perception among residents that community feedback is treated as a formality, while developers' interests carry more weight in municipal decision-making. What specific actions would you take to restore public confidence and ensure residents have a genuine voice in development decisions affecting their neighbourhoods?

Answer: Residents should be heard early enough to influence a decision. I would support accessible public meetings, clear explanations of proposals, and a record showing the concerns raised and how staff and Council addressed them. My 24-hour response commitment also applies: residents should know their concern was received, who is following up, and what happens next. In fact, there are enough excelling residents in their own fields of knowledge retired or not to an extent I am motivated to assemble a ‘Resident think tank’ in parallel on major projects to avoid consultants; report leaning decisions.

Question 11

Question: The Ontario Land Tribunal recently ruled in favour of the developer, Primont Homes, for their application regarding 2300 John Street. This happened over the objections of local residents, who continue to oppose this development. Please explain what, in your view, needs to be done differently in future so that the concerns of local residents are taken into account. This question has broader application beyond this one development, even though the question only references the Primont case.

Answer: The OLT decision cannot be changed by a councillor. For future cases, I would push the City to hear residents earlier, include their evidence in the planning record, and ensure Council has the expertise and resources to present its case. After an appeal, residents deserve a clear explanation of the result and what the City can improve next time.

Question 12

Question: There have been a few development approvals recently, where reduced parking ratios for proposed condo buildings have been accepted by the city on the grounds that some residents will not own cars and will use transit options. Examples include 2300 John Street (Primont Homes) and 8432 and 8500 Leslie Street at Highway 7 (Shatsford Development). Please explain what examples exist elsewhere in the city that demonstrate that Markham residents are moving to less car ownership in favour of transit use. In your view, is choosing to discourage car ownership realistic and viable for Markham?

Answer: Markham is still a car-oriented community, so I would not assume residents can simply give up their cars. Before reducing parking, require site-specific evidence about car ownership, transit access and demand. Review YRT and Viva frequency, connections and dedicated-lane use, then monitor actual travel patterns after occupancy. Lower parking should follow reliable transportation choices, not precede them.

Question 13

Question: Would you be willing to organize with other municipal councils to publicly oppose Ministerial Zoning Orders that do not align with municipal long term plans?

Answer: Yes. I would work with other municipal councils to publicly oppose MZOs that conflict with adopted long-term plans. We should present evidence about infrastructure and neighbourhood effects, insist on meaningful public input, and ask the Province to respect local planning. Municipalities have a stronger voice when they coordinate and explain their position openly.

Question 14

Question: Markham’s population has increased. As a result, wildlife is being forced out of their homes by development creating the potential for more human/wildlife conflicts. Despite this, Markham is only served by two Animal Care Officers and residents are told Markham is short staffed and unable to help them with many wildlife situations. If elected, what will you do to help improve the Animal Care service to Markham residents?

Answer: I would ask the City to review animal-care staffing, call volumes, response times and unmet requests, then bring forward a clear service plan. As Markham grows, service capacity must keep pace. I would also support better coordination with York Region and qualified wildlife organizations so residents receive timely guidance and urgent cases reach the right service.

Question 15

Question: Global bird populations are decreasing at an alarming rate. One of the main reasons is because of birds colliding with glass windows. Markham has prided itself for being a leader in the protection of birds through bird safe legislation; however, there are numerous municipal buildings which need to be retrofitted with bird-safe film to prevent injuries/death to resident and migratory birds. If elected, what will you do to help get existing Markham municipal buildings safe for birds?

Answer: I would ask the City to audit municipal buildings for bird-strike risks, prioritize the most dangerous locations, and fund a phased retrofit using bird-safe film or other proven treatments. New municipal construction and major renovations should meet bird-safe standards. The City should publish the schedule and report what has been completed.

Question 16

Question: Light and Noise Pollution is very harmful to nature and humans. It also blocks our ability to view the stars, planets and wonders of the universe. Brighter lights and upwards facing lighting is increasing despite recommendations to have night-sky compliant lighting. If elected, what will you do to mitigate light and noise pollution?

Answer: I would review municipal lighting and noise practices, starting with City facilities and projects. Use shielded, downward-facing lighting where practical, enforce existing noise rules consistently, and identify recurring problem areas with residents. Any changes should protect people and wildlife while making sure public spending is focused on measurable needs.

Question 17

Question: What is your expectation for the future quality of life for residents of Markham Ward One, as a result of the provincial MZO relating to the Yonge North Subway extension? The proposed dramatic increase in population, which far exceeds the previous Markham municipal plan for the area, is very troubling to residents. Do the current issues with the Vaughan Metropolitan Centre development perhaps provide a warning to the developers and politicians in Markham Ward One?

Answer: Ward One needs growth matched with transit, roads, community facilities and protection of its heritage character. The subway can improve connections, but a major population increase without supporting infrastructure will hurt quality of life. I would press for transparent phasing, funded services and ongoing consultation, and use traffic and transit reviews to identify where improvements are needed.

Question 18

Question: What is the plan for low income seniors, whose monthly income mostly goes for property taxes and car and home insurance?

Answer: My seniors’ plan is “live well, get there, find support.” That means more affordable and accessible senior housing, extending YRT On-Request 65+ service into evenings or weekends, and making services easier to find through a 311-style navigation point. I would also press for fairer provincial funding so seniors’ services do not depend on continually rising property taxes.

Question 19

Question: What would you do to tighten rules around vacant homes, and short & long term rentals to ensure that property standards are met?

Answer: I would support clear property standards and consistent enforcement for vacant homes and rental properties, with timely responses to resident complaints. I would ask staff to identify gaps in current bylaws and bring forward practical changes within municipal authority. Owners should be accountable for safe, maintained homes, and residents should receive a clear update when they report a problem. And I will also examine illegally operating ‘Short-term’ airbnb rising trends and reports from residents on house owners across Markham for these ‘Short term’ airbnb solicits crime-doers in using these grey areas to surveillance the neighbourhoods to target potential ‘Break-ins’.

Question 20

Question: With respect to e-bikes and micro-mobility vehicles, what regulations need to change in future to ensure the safety of pedestrians, cyclists and drivers? What changes are needed to ensure safe storage of these vehicles from a fire safety perspective?

Answer:E-bikes and e-scooters problems have become very visible and real in every Ward. I would work with York Region, police, fire services and the Province on ‘Enforcement’ of existing rules that protect pedestrians, cyclists and drivers, alongside education and consistent enforcement. If problematic trends persist, a complete review of these wide range of convenient travel tools will be categorically licensed to operate on roads. For storage and charging, I would seek clear fire-safety guidance for multi-unit buildings and safe charging practices, while making sure any new rules are practical and within municipal authority.

Question 21

Question: What do you think is the most important problem facing Markham today?

Answer: The most important problem is residents’ concern about safety and whether Markham’s services are keeping pace with rapid growth. People want to sleep without worrying about break-ins, get to work without avoidable congestion, and know seniors can find housing, transportation and support. Council must listen, follow through and account for how tax dollars are used.

Question 22

Question: What are your objectives about the environment and what can you do to protect it?

Answer: I would support responsible growth that protects natural areas and wildlife, and make environmental impacts visible in planning decisions. Practical steps include bird-safe municipal buildings, reviewing light and noise impacts, and ensuring roads, transit and services keep pace with development. I would work with residents and conservation partners, then report progress clearly.

Question 23

Question: What about bringing more jobs to York Region, especially in Markham?

Answer: I would make it easier to start and grow a business through a Business Navigator: one clear roadmap for zoning, permits, fire and health requirements, licences, processing times and application status. I would set service standards and clear case ownership. To create jobs for young people, I would help match employers and workers and support small businesses hiring interns or graduates.

Question 24

Question: What does success look like at the end of your next four years as Mayor (as councillor)?

Answer: 1) As Community sees safety as a top concern, York Region has about 140 police officers per 100,000 residents, compared with an Ontario average of 175–185. Residents will see the gap closing. 2) YRT On-Request 65+ door to door seniors transportation Mon to Fri / 7am-3pm / with a radius of merely 5km to all week long / 7 to 7 / service radius increase to 8km. Implementation of Canadian made SMART TRAFFIC Light system to solve immediate grid lot during peak hours. 3) Residents will see the constant Push for Equity of an outdated appropriation of funding formula from the Ontario government, $450 million shortchanged yearly for decades back to York Region in relieving tax hike pressure on City Hall.

Question: Given the provincial over reach and their constraints on municipal planning, what can you (as mayor; as councillor) do specifically and Council do collectively to represent the interests of Markham residents?

Answer: As a councillor, I would bring residents’ views and evidence to Council, insist on transparent consultation, and work with other municipalities to challenge provincial decisions that override local plans. Council should use every lawful planning and advocacy tool available, make its case publicly, media exposure and press the Province to reform funding formulas so fast-growing communities can provide needed services without placing the full burden on property taxpayers.

Question 26

Question: In York Region, Jews are 60-70K in number, about 5% of the population. There are 15-18 synagogues and 5-7 Jewish schools. In Markham, Jews are 3.5-5K in number, about 1% of the population.
According to widely published statistics, York Region has witnessed “a troubling increase in antisemitic incidents. Jewish residents represented 79% of victims in religion-based hate crimes, despite their relatively small proportion of the local population.” Specific hate incidents include: vandalism of synagogues, antisemitic graffiti, and threats against community leaders.
What would you do to tackle the issue of antisemitism in the City or Region?

Answer: I have consistently stood with the Jewish community, especially since October 7. Melissa Lantsman, MP for Thornhill, has endorsed me and can attest to my commitment. As a councillor, I would work with York Regional Police, Jewish organizations and relevant municipal and regional services to support timely reporting and responses to antisemitic threats, vandalism and harassment. I would listen to affected residents, support practical education and prevention, and speak out against antisemitism. Everyone should be able to worship, learn and gather safely.

Question: Why is there limited planning cooperation between Markham, Vaughan and York Region to protect the heritage nature of Ward One?

Answer: It may be the case of the previous administration but I would bring Markham, Vaughan and York Region together to identify Ward One’s heritage assets and coordinate planning decisions that affect them. In fact it should be Markham-wide protection regardless of wards. Joint planning should connect heritage protection with transportation and responsible growth. Residents should see shared priorities, clear responsibilities and public updates rather than having to navigate separate processes.

Question 28

Question: Can you tell us how you would propose the Region handle the funding gap of $2 billion in bus rapid transit and community housing?

Answer: It will take a very determined and collective effort of all regional councillors at least four of our Markham regional councillors to act as one that will take tremendous active in and outside the council time in reaching a consensus. A $2-billion gap needs a transparent, phased plan and a serious case for provincial and federal support. I would press for a funding formula that reflects population growth, age, income, service demand and local costs, rather than relying on outdated historical allocations. York Region should publish project priorities, costs and trade-offs; the full gap should not simply be passed to property taxpayers.

Question 29

Question: Paul Chiang, sitting just a few feet away from Joe Tay, we are wondering if there is anything you would like to say?
I want to be clear I’m running for Regional Councillor with a commitment that residents always come first. That’s why I’m ready to put this behind us and work with anyone for what’s best for Markham's future. Angie and I have faced the consequences together, and I don’t blame her for still feeling distressed. Afterall RCMP came to my home unscheduled with a warning based on their credible information intercepted that someone might harm me physically after the "joke" was made, they sent security outside our home for 24/7 over a month to make sure we were safe. If indeed one day we serve together, I’m happy to turn the page and work constructively with Paul and others to bring the best ideas forward for Markham. We are public servants and residents deserve a Council where difficult decisions are made with sound judgment and elected officials are accountable for their words.

Question 30

Question: How, given the Province's powers/interests in place which override local community interests, do you intend to take planning back / local planning decisions back into the hands of the municipality? We want our interests and ideas to be as influential as developers, and need reps to represent us more emphatically!

Answer: A councillor cannot take planning authority back from the Province alone. I would make residents’ views central to local decisions, insist on open consultation, and work with other councils to oppose provincial overrides that conflict with adopted plans. Council should use lawful submissions and public advocacy, explain its position, and press for funding rules that let municipalities plan for growth responsibly.

---

Jim Jones Questions and Answers ......

MARKHAM REGIONAL COUNCILLOR

Responses to Thornhill Ratepayers — October 2026

1. Will you support funding to protect vacant, City-owned heritage homes?

Yes. Heritage buildings are part of Markham’s identity, and allowing publicly owned heritage properties to deteriorate is unacceptable.
I support a comprehensive inventory and condition assessment of City-owned heritage buildings, followed by a prioritized maintenance and restoration program.
We should stabilize deteriorating buildings before repairs become substantially more expensive and explore partnerships that allow these properties to be restored and put to productive community use.
Protecting our heritage is an investment in Markham’s history and future.


2. How many data centres are in York Region? Would you support a one-year moratorium and public consultation? Who pays for infrastructure and environmental impacts?

I support artificial intelligence and data-centre investment because these industries can create economic opportunities. However, they must not impose additional costs on homeowners or compromise our environment.
I would first request a complete public inventory of existing and proposed data centres in York Region. The precise number needs to be confirmed.
I would support considering a time-limited pause on new discretionary municipal approvals, where legally permitted, while appropriate standards and public consultation processes are established.

My position is based on seven principles:

Data centres must pay their full electricity costs.
Developers must fund infrastructure upgrades attributable to their projects.
Water consumption must be measured and publicly reported.
Noise, emissions and environmental impacts must be controlled.
Grid reliability must be protected.
Local communities must receive economic benefits.
Municipal decisions must be transparent, with meaningful public consultation.

Commercially confidential matters may sometimes require closed meetings, but substantive planning decisions should be made publicly in accordance with the law.
My principle is simple: Data Centres Pay for Data Centres. Residents should not subsidize private infrastructure investments.



3. What would you do about homelessness, public safety and sanitation at Yonge and Steeles?

This situation requires both compassion and accountability.
People experiencing homelessness deserve access to housing, mental-health treatment, addiction services and meaningful assistance. At the same time, residents and businesses deserve safe, clean and accessible public spaces.

As Regional Councillor, I would advocate establishing a coordinated Yonge-Steeles Community Safety and Homelessness Response Team involving Markham, Vaughan, Toronto, York Region, York Regional Police, public-health agencies and community service providers.

The team should coordinate outreach, housing referrals, crisis intervention, sanitation, needle collection and enforcement where appropriate.

I would also support identifying a lead agency, establishing measurable service standards and reporting progress publicly.

The objective must be to help people move into stable housing while restoring safety and cleanliness.

We cannot solve homelessness by simply moving people from one sidewalk to another. We need coordinated services, clear responsibility and measurable results.



4. What can you do to reduce break-ins and robberies across York Region?

Community safety is a fundamental responsibility of government.

As a Regional Councillor, I participate in decisions affecting York Region’s police budget.

I support providing York Regional Police with the resources necessary to address break-ins, home invasions, organized theft and repeat offenders.

I would advocate targeted patrols in high-risk neighbourhoods, better crime-data analysis, improved coordination with neighbouring police services and stronger community crime-prevention programs.

We must also continue pressing federal and provincial governments to address repeat violent offending and strengthen the effectiveness of the bail system while respecting due process.

Residents should feel safe in their homes, businesses and neighbourhoods.

5. Why has Shouldice Park not been officially named and signed? How will you ensure permanent protection?

The acquisition of the Shouldice lands represents a significant public investment, and residents deserve clarity about their future.

I support formally confirming the lands’ intended parkland status, establishing appropriate signage and preparing a long-term park management plan.

I would request a public staff report identifying the property’s current legal designation, any restrictions on future use and the steps necessary to provide lasting protection.

If additional legal protections or planning designations are required, Council should consider them.

Residents deserve assurance that publicly acquired parkland will remain available for future generations.

6. When will Pomona Park be properly connected to Shouldice Park?

Residents should not have to walk through a damaged chain-link fence to access public open space.

I would request that City staff investigate the current access arrangements, property boundaries, safety concerns and opportunities for a permanent pedestrian connection between Pomona Park and the Shouldice lands.

The immediate priority should be a safe and clearly marked connection, subject to confirming ownership and access rights.

I would also request a project timeline and cost estimate.

Connecting our parks and trails should be a practical priority, not an unresolved problem.

7. Why is Shouldice not officially designated as a park? Would you support acquiring land to connect Glynnwood and Pomona Park?

I support formally establishing the Shouldice lands as protected public parkland, subject to confirming the current legal and planning status.

I would ask staff to identify the necessary steps for designation, signage, public access and long-term protection.

I would also support examining the feasibility of acquiring or securing an easement over the land needed to connect Glynnwood, Pomona Park and Shouldice.

Any acquisition should be based on fair market value, public benefit and responsible financial planning.

Our objective should be a connected network of parks, trails and natural areas throughout Thornhill.

8. What would you do to prevent the Province from overriding municipal plans through Minister’s Zoning Orders?

I believe local planning decisions should reflect the interests of residents and the long-term plans developed through public consultation.

Minister’s Zoning Orders can override important elements of municipal planning, and their use should be exceptional rather than routine.

I would advocate requiring meaningful municipal consultation, transparent justification and proper infrastructure and environmental assessments before provincial intervention.

Where an MZO conflicts with Markham’s established planning objectives, I would support Council formally expressing its opposition and seeking changes.

The Province has significant planning authority, but that does not mean municipal governments should remain silent.

9. Do you accept campaign donations from developers? How can residents trust your independence?

I believe every elected official must make decisions based on planning principles, the public interest and the evidence before Council—not on political contributions.

Ontario’s municipal election financing rules prohibit corporate donations. Eligible individuals, including people who work in the development industry, may make contributions within the legal limits.

All campaign contributions must be properly recorded and disclosed as required by law.

I support transparency, full compliance with election financing rules and appropriate declarations of conflicts of interest.

My responsibility is to the residents of Markham. No campaign contribution should influence a planning decision.

10. How would you restore public confidence in development decisions?

Residents must have a meaningful voice in shaping their neighbourhoods.

As Chair of Markham’s Development Services Committee, I believe public consultation should occur early enough to influence development proposals—not simply after major decisions have effectively been made.

I support earlier community meetings, clearer explanations of proposed developments, accessible planning information and written responses to major resident concerns.

I would also support reporting how public feedback influenced the final recommendations presented to Council.

Consultation must be meaningful, transparent and capable of changing outcomes.

11. What should be done differently following the Ontario Land Tribunal decision concerning 2300 John Street?

The concerns surrounding 2300 John Street demonstrate why municipalities need strong, defensible planning policies and meaningful community involvement before development applications reach the Ontario Land Tribunal.

Residents’ concerns about traffic, density, building height, parking, neighbourhood character and infrastructure must be carefully evaluated and supported by appropriate technical evidence.

I support earlier consultation, stronger transportation and infrastructure assessments and clearer planning policies that can withstand appeals.

We should also examine tribunal decisions to understand where municipal planning policies or evidence need strengthening.

We need to address community concerns before disputes reach the tribunal—not simply react after decisions have been made.

12. Is reducing parking requirements realistic for Markham?

Reducing car dependency is an important long-term objective, but we must be realistic about current transportation conditions.

Markham is not downtown Toronto. Many residents still depend on cars for employment, shopping, healthcare and family responsibilities.

Reduced parking requirements should be supported by reliable transit, demonstrated travel patterns and credible parking-demand studies.

I support building complete transit-oriented communities around GO stations, subways and rapid transit, but transit service must improve alongside development.

I would also support monitoring actual vehicle ownership and parking demand in completed developments.

We should provide residents with better transportation choices—not simply eliminate parking before practical alternatives exist.



13. Would you work with other municipal councils to oppose inappropriate Minister’s Zoning Orders?

Yes.

Where provincial zoning decisions conflict with carefully developed municipal plans, I would support coordinated advocacy involving Markham, Vaughan, York Region and other affected municipalities.

A united municipal position carries greater weight than isolated objections.

I would support joint resolutions, direct meetings with provincial ministers and proposals for legislative changes that strengthen municipal consultation.

14. How would you improve Animal Care services and wildlife response?

As Markham grows, interactions between residents and wildlife will increase.

I support reviewing Animal Care staffing levels, service demand, response times and the resources available to assist residents.

If the review demonstrates that additional Animal Care Officers or specialized partnerships are necessary, I will support considering those investments through the budget process.

I also believe prevention is important, including public education, wildlife corridors, habitat protection and humane conflict-management practices.

15. Would you support retrofitting municipal buildings with bird-safe glass treatments?

Yes.

Markham should lead by example in protecting birds and biodiversity.

I support an assessment of municipal buildings to identify locations where bird collisions are occurring or where the risk is particularly high.

We should prioritize bird-safe window treatments, appropriate lighting changes and other proven measures at the highest-risk facilities.

These improvements can be incorporated into regular building maintenance and capital improvement programs to control costs.

16. What would you do about light and noise pollution?

Light and noise pollution affect public health, neighbourhood quality of life and wildlife.

I support reviewing municipal lighting standards to encourage downward-directed, energy-efficient, appropriately shielded lighting.

We should reduce unnecessary illumination, particularly near natural areas and residential neighbourhoods.

I also support reviewing noise regulations and strengthening enforcement where recurring problems affect residents.

New developments should be designed to minimize light spill, mechanical noise and other impacts on neighbouring properties.

Good urban design should protect both people and the natural environment.



17. What is your vision for quality of life in Ward One following the Yonge North Subway Extension and provincial intensification?

The Yonge North Subway Extension is an important transportation investment, but successful transit planning requires much more than increasing density around stations.

We must plan housing, roads, schools, parks, healthcare, community facilities, utilities and employment together.

I believe growth should be concentrated in appropriate transit-oriented locations while protecting established residential neighbourhoods.

The experience of Vaughan Metropolitan Centre demonstrates the importance of coordinating development with transportation capacity, public amenities and infrastructure delivery.

We should learn from both its achievements and its challenges.

My approach is to develop complete communities rather than isolated high-rise developments.

Don’t Just Build Transit—Build an Economy Around It.

18. What is your plan to help low-income seniors struggling with property taxes and living expenses?

Many seniors live on fixed incomes while property taxes, insurance, utilities and everyday expenses continue to increase.

I support responsible municipal budgeting, controlling unnecessary expenditures and protecting existing homeowners from unfairly bearing the cost of new growth.

I would also advocate reviewing available property-tax relief and deferral programs for eligible low-income seniors and improving awareness of these programs.

Where additional assistance is needed, we should work with provincial and federal governments to strengthen income supports and housing affordability.

Seniors who helped build our communities should not be forced from their homes because they can no longer afford basic living expenses.

19. How would you strengthen property standards for vacant homes and rental properties?

Vacant and poorly maintained properties can create safety problems and negatively affect surrounding neighbourhoods.

I support stronger property standards enforcement, clearer maintenance requirements and more effective responses to repeat violations.

The City should review whether existing regulations adequately address vacant buildings, short-term rentals and rental properties with persistent maintenance problems.

Where appropriate, we should consider registration, inspections and escalating enforcement measures.

Property ownership carries responsibilities to neighbours and the wider community.



20. What changes are needed for e-bikes, e-scooters and micromobility safety, including fire prevention?

Micromobility can provide useful transportation alternatives, but pedestrian safety must come first.

I support reviewing and strengthening regulations governing where e-scooters and e-bikes can operate, particularly on sidewalks and in areas with heavy pedestrian activity.

We need clear rules, appropriate speed restrictions, better signage and effective enforcement.

We should also work with fire services to strengthen public education and applicable safety requirements for lithium-ion batteries, charging equipment and storage.

Unsafe batteries, improper chargers and charging in obstructed exits can create serious fire hazards.

We should encourage innovation in transportation while ensuring pedestrians, cyclists, drivers and building occupants are protected.

21. What is the most important problem facing Markham today?

I believe Markham’s greatest challenge is managing growth while protecting affordability and quality of life.

Traffic congestion, housing costs, infrastructure pressures, community safety and environmental protection are interconnected.

We cannot solve these problems by planning one development or one road at a time.

My approach is to coordinate housing, transportation, employment, infrastructure and environmental protection through long-term planning.

We need to manage today’s challenges while preparing Markham for tomorrow.

22. What are your environmental objectives?

My environmental priorities include protecting parks, farmland, natural heritage and water resources while preparing Markham for a more sustainable economy.

I support expanding solar energy, geothermal and district energy systems, battery storage, water conservation and energy-efficient buildings.

I also support urban forestry, wildlife protection, improved stormwater management and stronger environmental standards for major developments.

We should explore waste-to-energy technologies where they can meet strict environmental and economic requirements.

Environmental protection and economic development should reinforce each other.



23. How would you bring more jobs to York Region and Markham?

Markham should continue developing as a major centre for technology, innovation, education, healthcare and advanced industries.

I support attracting investment in artificial intelligence, advanced manufacturing, clean technology, life sciences and other emerging sectors.

However, economic development must be integrated with transportation and land-use planning.

My vision is to build a regional economy around interconnected GO corridors, subways and rapid transit, bringing housing, employment, education and major destinations closer together.

The Stouffville GO Corridor offers a significant opportunity to create new employment centres and transit-oriented communities.

We should build more jobs close to home and reduce the need for long daily commutes.

24. What would success look like after your next four years as Regional Councillor?

Success would mean measurable improvements in residents’ daily lives.

I would want to see progress in reducing traffic congestion, advancing rapid transit, improving community safety, protecting established neighbourhoods and strengthening municipal finances.

I would also want meaningful progress on the Stouffville GO Corridor master plan, better coordination of housing and infrastructure, new employment opportunities and stronger environmental protection.

Above all, I want residents to see that their municipal government listens, plans responsibly and delivers results.

My goal is to leave Markham safer, more affordable, better connected and better prepared for the future.

25. How can Council represent residents when the Province overrides municipal planning authority?

Municipal councils must use every available legal, planning and political mechanism to represent their residents.

That includes adopting strong Official Plan policies, preparing credible technical studies, conducting meaningful public consultation and making evidence-based recommendations.

We must also negotiate directly with provincial officials, work with neighbouring municipalities and publicly challenge decisions that undermine sound community planning.

Where provincial decisions are unavoidable, we should focus on securing appropriate infrastructure, parks, community facilities and protections for established neighbourhoods.

Municipal leadership means standing up for residents even when another level of government has the final authority.



26. What would you do to address antisemitism in Markham and York Region?

Antisemitism has no place in Markham or York Region.

Every resident deserves to feel safe practising their religion, attending school, operating a business and participating in community life.

I support working closely with York Regional Police to prevent and investigate hate crimes, protect vulnerable institutions and strengthen relationships with Jewish community organizations.

I also support education initiatives that promote understanding, respect and awareness of antisemitism and other forms of hatred.

We must respond promptly and consistently to threats, vandalism, harassment and hate-motivated incidents.

Our diversity is one of Markham’s greatest strengths, and protecting every community is a shared responsibility.

27. Why is there limited planning cooperation between Markham, Vaughan and York Region to protect Ward One’s heritage character?

Ward One is influenced by development and transportation decisions on both sides of municipal boundaries.

I believe stronger intermunicipal planning coordination is necessary, particularly along the Yonge Street corridor.

I would support establishing a coordinated planning process involving Markham, Vaughan and York Region to address heritage conservation, transportation, density, infrastructure and public amenities.

Planning should recognize the character of established neighbourhoods rather than treating municipal boundaries as barriers.

28. How would you address the Region’s reported $2-billion funding gap for bus rapid transit and community housing?

Transit and community housing are essential regional infrastructure, and municipalities cannot reasonably carry the full financial burden alone.

I would advocate a coordinated funding strategy involving York Region, the Province and the federal government.

We should prioritize projects based on need, readiness, public benefit and long-term financial sustainability.

I also support examining appropriate development-related funding, infrastructure partnerships and opportunities to capture some of the increased land value created by public transit investments.

However, we must ensure that new growth contributes its fair share without unfairly increasing the burden on existing homeowners.

Growth Pays for Growth.



29. Paul Chiang is sitting near Joe Tay. Is there anything you would like to say?

I believe public officials and candidates should treat one another with respect, regardless of political differences.

We can disagree strongly on policies and public issues without making politics personal.

My focus is on representing Markham residents, improving community safety, strengthening our economy and building a better future.

I believe voters are best served when political discussions focus on ideas, accountability and results.

30. How would you restore local influence over planning decisions and ensure residents have a voice equal to developers?

I believe residents must be genuine partners in planning Markham’s future.

---

Thornhill All Candidates Meeting Monday October 5th, 2026 at 7:00 p.m.

ou are invited to the Thornhill Municipal All Candidates Meeting.

When: October 5th, 2026

Where: Thornhill Community Center Activity Rooms B1 and B2

7755 Bayview Avenue

Time: from 7 to 9 p.m.

Send your questions to questions@thornhillwardone.com

---

2025 AGM

---

Pomona Mills Park Clean Up : April 27th, 2025 from 10 a.m. to noon ....

---

Pomona Millls Park planting: Wednesday, May, 15th, 2024 from 5 to 7 p.m. ..........

You are invited to the 25th Anniversary of the Annual Pomona Mills Park Planting by the Pomona MIlls Park Conservationists.

When: Wednesday May 15th, 2024

Time: From 5 to 7 p.m.

Where: Pomona Mills Meadow

Enter the park by 15 Church Lane

For More information:

Contact: Valerie12burke@gmail.com

---

Powered by Coranto

What is this?